The Middle Path in Education: A Philosophical Approach to Balanced Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31305/rrijm2024.v04.n04.004Keywords:
Middle Path, Balanced Learning, Buddhist Philosophy, Educational Well-beingAbstract
As a philosophical framework for well-rounded education, the Middle Path is the subject of this article. Excessive academic pressure, an overemphasis on test scores, and an ever-increasing reliance on digital technology are some of the extremes that shape learning in today’s educational system. Meanwhile, people often fail to prioritize their emotional health and ethical development. Because of this disparity, students experience anxiety, disengagement, and stunted personal development. This study presents the Middle Path as a viable framework for re-establishing harmony in contemporary educational systems; it has its origins in Buddhist thought. A person’s intellectual, emotional, and ethical growth should all be in harmony with one another, and the Middle Path stresses moderation and awareness in this regard. Presenting a holistic view of education as an ongoing process of balanced development, this study integrates viewpoints from Eastern philosophy with those of Western educational theorists like Dewey, Freire, and Noddings. It argues that we should be teaching students to think critically, emotionally, and reflectively in addition to acquiring factual knowledge. Concerning modern issues in education, such as student anxiety, information overload, and a lack of focus on health and wellness, I believe the Middle Path to be extremely pertinent. In order to foster academic success and personal growth, it provides teachers with a philosophical and practical framework for designing balanced instructional practices. The authors of this study draw the conclusion that today’s students can be better prepared for life’s challenges by following the Middle Path in the classroom.
References
Aristotle. (2009). Nicomachean ethics (W. D. Ross, Trans.). Oxford University Press. (Original work published ca. 4th century BCE)
Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: Handbook I: Cognitive domain. Longmans.
Bodhi, B. (Trans.). (2000). The connected discourses of the Buddha: A translation of the Samyutta Nikaya. Wisdom Publications.
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. Macmillan.
Dewey, J. (1985). Self-realization as the moral ideal (Original work published 1932). In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), The later works of John Dewey, 1925–1953.
Dewey, J. (2007). Democracy and education (Original work published 1916). Cosimo Classics.
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Herder and Herder.
Klimova, B., & Pikhart, M. (2025). Psychological well-being and digitalization in education. Frontiers Research Topics in Education.
Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. Jossey-Bass.
Noddings, N. (1984). Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral education. University of California Press.
Schonert-Reichl, K. A. (2019). Social and emotional learning and teachers. The Future of Children, 29(1), 137–155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/foc.2017.0007
Flores-Buils, R., & Mateu-Pérez, M. (2024). Student stress in educational transitions and resilience factors. Higher Education Well-being Studies, 15(7), 872–885. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15020222