From Protection to Prosecution: A Critical Analysis of the POCSO Act’s Implementation Gaps and Their Impact on Child-Centric Justice in India

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31305/rrijm2025.v05.n04.004

Keywords:

Child sexual abuse, child-rights, protection-oriented, child-centric, adolescence

Abstract

Child sexual abuse (CSA) has been an extensive but grossly underreported vice in India, influenced by the social stigma, family pressure, retaliation fear, and the lack of trust in institutions. Although the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO) is a wholesome legal procedure established by the state to ensure that legislation protects children, loopholes between the separation of the law and reality still prevail to frustrate the process of offering effective child-centric justice. In this paper, the author will critically analyze how the POCSO regime has shifted to be more of a protection-oriented policy rather than a prosecution-oriented one. The main aim of the research is to find and examine structural, procedural and institutional failures in the overall implementation of the POCSO Act and evaluate the effect of such failures on the rights, dignity and well-being of child victims. The article is written in the mixed methodological framework, which consists of doctrinal legal review of laws, judicial case laws, and governmental policies and regulations, as well as the empirical information, as represented by the official crime data, government reports, and academic research. This paper concludes that the POCSO Act is a positive move in the field of child protection jurisprudence, which is undermined by the systemic inabilities to implement the law to facilitate justice in a child-centric way. To restore the law to its original child-rights mandate, institutional capacity is needed, as well as trauma-informed practices and rebalancing the prosecution and protection.

Author Biographies

  • Ms. Insha Khan, Research Scholar, School of Law, Raffles University, Neemrana

    Insha Khan is a doctoral research scholar at the School of Law, Raffles University, Rajasthan, specializing in Criminal Law and Child Protection Laws. She is currently pursuing her Ph.D. on the topic “Efficacy of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 with Special Reference to the Age of Consent,” focusing on legislative intent, judicial interpretation, and implementation challenges. Her areas of academic interest include the POCSO Act, Indian Penal Code, Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, child rights jurisprudence, and victim-centric criminal justice. She is actively engaged in doctrinal and socio-legal research and has participated in academic conferences, seminars, and workshops. Her research adopts a critical and analytical approach aimed at strengthening child protection mechanisms while ensuring constitutional safeguards and balanced justice delivery in India.

  • Dr. Sahil, Assistant Professor, School of Law, Raffles University, Neemrana

    Dr. Sahil is an Assistant Professor at the School of Law, Raffles University, Rajasthan. He specializes in Criminal Law and has a strong academic interest in contemporary issues relating to criminal justice administration, child protection laws, and statutory interpretation. With experience in teaching and legal research, he actively engages in doctrinal and analytical studies focusing on the effectiveness of criminal legislations and judicial trends in India. Dr. Sahil has contributed to academic discourse through participation in seminars, conferences, and scholarly discussions at national and institutional levels.

References

Agarwal, A. (2020). Implementation challenges under the POCSO Act: A judicial perspective. Indian Journal of Law and Justice, 11(2), 45–62.

Deb, S., & Walsh, K. (2012). Impact of child sexual abuse on mental health: A review of Indian studies. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 21(5), 525–543. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10538712.2012.694403

Deb, S., Mukherjee, A., & Mathews, B. (2011). Aggression, anxiety, and depression in victims of child sexual abuse. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26(15), 2925–2946.

Eastwood, C., Kift, S., & Grace, R. (2015). Trauma-informed justice: Responding to victims and witnesses. Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 27(1), 15–30.

Garland, D. (2001). The culture of control: Crime and social order in contemporary society. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226190174.001.0001

Goldstein, J., Freud, A., & Solnit, A. (1996). The best interests of the child: The least detrimental alternative. Free Press.

Herman, J. L. (2015). Trauma and recovery: The aftermath of violence from domestic abuse to political terror. Basic Books.

Human Rights Watch. (2017). Breaking the silence: Child sexual abuse in India. Human Rights Watch Publications.

Jain, A., & Prakash, S. (2021). Forensic and medico-legal challenges in child sexual abuse cases. Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, 15(3), 232–238.

Kacker, L., Varadan, S., & Kumar, P. (2007). Study on child abuse: India 2007. Ministry of Women and Child Development, Government of India.

Lamb, M. E., Orbach, Y., Hershkowitz, I., Esplin, P. W., & Horowitz, D. (2008). A structured forensic interview protocol improves the quality of investigative interviews with children. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(2), 352–365.

Law Commission of India. (2023). Reforms in laws relating to sexual offences against children. Government of India.

Mehta, B. (2021). Adolescent sexuality and the POCSO Act: A critical appraisal. National Law School of India Review, 33(1), 89–110.

Ministry of Women and Child Development. (2012). Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012. Government of India.

Ministry of Women and Child Development. (2021). Guidelines for child protection and victim compensation under POCSO. Government of India.

Mukherjee, R. (2020). Misuse of POCSO Act and the need for judicial balance. Criminal Law Journal, 126(4), 401–410.

National Crime Records Bureau. (2022). Crime in India 2021. Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India.

Satish, M. (2019). The death penalty for rape of children: A deterrence myth. National Law University Delhi Law Review, 6(1), 1–22.

Skelton, A. (2013). Restorative justice as a framework for responding to child offenders. British Journal of Criminology, 53(3), 493–512.

World Health Organization. (2017). Guidelines for medico-legal care for victims of sexual violence. WHO Press.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-31

How to Cite

Khan, I., & Sahil. (2025). From Protection to Prosecution: A Critical Analysis of the POCSO Act’s Implementation Gaps and Their Impact on Child-Centric Justice in India. Revista Review Index Journal of Multidisciplinary, 5(4), 21-29. https://doi.org/10.31305/rrijm2025.v05.n04.004