Artificial Intelligence Models as a Guide to Conduct Bibliometric Analysis of Research on STEAM Learning

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31305/rrijm2025.v05.n01.003

Keywords:

Deep Seek-AGI, STEAM Education, Mathematics Learning, Bibliometric Analysis, Database

Abstract

The landscape of artificial intelligence is rapidly evolving, driven by the proliferation of sophisticated Large Language Models (LLMs). As demonstrated by Kasneci et al. (2023), models like ChatGPT are capable of generating educational content and providing on-demand support, highlighting their potential to transform learning environments. This ability to synthesize and generate information is fundamentally changing how knowledge is accessed and utilized. Furthermore, the multimodal capabilities of models like Gemini, which can process and integrate information from various sources (text, images, code), are expanding the scope of AI applications (Ruder, 2021). This study explores the transformative potential of DeepSeek's AI technologies in STEAM Learning (Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, and Mathematics). The study presents a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of research at the intersection of STEAM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, and Mathematics) learning over the past decade. Using data from repository; PubMed, researcher analyzed 37 publications to identify trends, key contributors, and emerging themes. The findings revealed a steady increase in research output since 2017, with significant contributions from the United States, China, and the United Kingdom. Leading journals such as the International Journal of STEM Education and Journal for Research in Mathematics Education dominate the field, while influential authors and institutions drive collaborative networks. This study provides a roadmap for future research, emphasizing the need for interdisciplinary collaboration and a focus on underrepresented sectors. The results provide insight for educators, policymakers, and researchers aiming to advance STEAM learning globally.

Author Biography

  • Dr. Archana Pandey

    Dr. Archana Pandey is a highly motivated Educator with a strong academic foundation, holding an M.Sc. in Mathematics (CGPA 9.38) and a Doctorate in Educational Technology with JRF fellowship received from UGC. She completed her Doctorate in Educational Technology specialization from University of Allahabad, Uttar Pradesh, India. She is mentoring one of the UNESCO HUB Sustainability 1 project in OE4BW. Her research expertise is evident through a Research Associate role in a significant government project in Gandhinagar coupled with six years of dedicated research and teaching experience. She is currently working as Assistant Professor in Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Open University, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.

References

Biehl, M., Kim, H., & Wade, M. (2006). Relationships among the academic business disciplines: A multi-method citation analysis. Omega, 34(4), 359-371.

Brynjolfsson, E., & Mitchell, T. (2017). What can machine learning do? Workforce implications. Science, 358(6370), 1530-1534.

Chen, H., Cai, M., Huang, K., & Jin, S. (2021). Classification and Evolution Analysis of Key Transportation Technologies Based on Bibliometrics. Scientific Programming, 2021.

Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296.

Henriksen, D., & Mishra, P. (2015). A framework for creative learning in the age of networked intelligence. TechTrends, 60(1), 24-31.

Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Holubec, E. J. (2014). Cooperation in the classroom. Interaction Book Company.

Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannach, D., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., & Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274.

LaForce, M., Noble, E., & Holt, K. (2017). Integrating mathematics and science in a STEAM-focused professional development program. School Science and Mathematics, 117(5), 174-185

Li, Y., Wang, K., Xiao, Y., & Froyd, J. E. (2020). Research and trends in STEM education: A systematic review of journal publications. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 1-16.

Minner, J. A., Levy, A. J., & Century, J. A. (2010). Inquiry-based science instruction: What is it and does it matter? National Research Council.

National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. National Academies Press.

Pranckutė, R. (2021). Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The titans of bibliographic information in today’s academic world. Publications, 9(1), 12.

Roll, I., & Wylie, R. (2016). Evolution and revolution in artificial intelligence in education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(4), 582-599.

Ruder, S. (2021). A Survey of Multimodal Deep Learning. An International Peer-Reviewed Multidisciplinary Journal, 2(Special Issue), 1675–1688. https://doi.org/10.63034/esr-335

Stanford HAI. (2023). Artificial Intelligence Index Report 2023. Stanford Human-Centered AI Institute. Retrieved from https://hai.stanford.edu/research/ai-index

VanLehn, K. (2011). The relative effectiveness of human tutoring, intelligent tutoring systems, and other tutoring systems. Educational Psychologist, 46(4), 197-221.

Yakman, G. (2018). STEAM education: What is important and why? International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), 22.

Downloads

Published

2025-03-31

How to Cite

Pandey, A. (2025). Artificial Intelligence Models as a Guide to Conduct Bibliometric Analysis of Research on STEAM Learning . Revista Review Index Journal of Multidisciplinary, 5(1), 22-29. https://doi.org/10.31305/rrijm2025.v05.n01.003